v1 competence retained
- Rationale and evidence
- Observed old procedure demonstration
- Revisit condition
- Do not relabel as full v2 proof
Knowledge continuity / Delivery leads, planning owners and acceptance reviewers
Decision ledgerRecheck knowledge after its governing workflow changes
Version a competence claim when the task procedure changes.
The artifact keys a competence claim to a procedure version, distinct from updating a team instruction document.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Original worked case · Manual planning resource
Inspect the decision, not just the summary.
Start with the invented evidence, follow the reasoning, and retain its limits when adapting the brief.
01 · Inspect the inputs
Every record stays visible
| Procedure boundary | v1 demonstration | v2 requirement | Current proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary final review | Demonstrated | Retained | Historical evidence applicable to retained step |
| Localization review | Not in v1 | New required stage | Unverified |
| Transition to final review | v1 direct route | After localization | Needs v2 rehearsal |
Use horizontal scrolling for wide tables. These records are invented, not customer data.
02 · Follow the reasoning
How the case leads to a decision
The earlier demonstration covers the old route. A new required stage and its ordering are not established by the unchanged person name or prior attendance.
The bounded result
Retain the v1 demonstration as historical evidence and recheck the new localization-to-final-review transition before calling v2 competence demonstrated.
Definitions and method context
Records, decisions and policies are original synthetic examples. External references supply context; they do not validate these cases or TeamBoostAI capabilities.
Original worked-case definitions
Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.
External references checked 6 October 2026. Demand for these topics has not been measured.
Keep the reason with the decision
Illustrative decision recordSynthetic planning case: A colleague demonstrated the v1 publishing procedure, which had one final review. Procedure v2 now requires a separate localization review before that final stage. The prior competence note still says current procedure demonstrated.
New localization stage
- Rationale and evidence
- Absent from v1 demonstration
- Revisit condition
- Targeted rehearsal required
v2 transition evidence
- Rationale and evidence
- Localization accepted before final review
- Revisit condition
- Count current proof only after demonstration
Decision to make: Retain the v1 demonstration as historical evidence and recheck the new localization-to-final-review transition before calling v2 competence demonstrated.
Version the competence claim
Owner role · Operating owner
Evidence: The recorded evidence names procedure v1 rather than a timeless current qualification.
Locate changed required behavior
Owner role · Procedure reviewer
Evidence: Localization and its transition to final review are new in v2.
Assign the bounded recheck
Owner role · Receiving lead
Evidence: The colleague demonstrates the new stage ordering before v2 coverage is counted.
Filled manual planning note
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
Retain the v1 demonstration as historical evidence and recheck the new localization-to-final-review transition before calling v2 competence demonstrated. The earlier demonstration covers the old route. A new required stage and its ordering are not established by the unchanged person name or prior attendance. The page records local procedure-specific proof, not certification or a judgment of general personal ability.
Put the outline to work
- Version the competence claim. Check: The recorded evidence names procedure v1 rather than a timeless current qualification.
- Locate changed required behavior. Check: Localization and its transition to final review are new in v2.
- Assign the bounded recheck. Check: The colleague demonstrates the new stage ordering before v2 coverage is counted.
Questions about this workflow
Must all prior learning be discarded?
No. Retained stages keep their relevant evidence; the changed boundary needs a targeted check.
Does editing the knowledge note prove competence?
No. Updated documentation and an observed task demonstration are different evidence.
Does this create tasks in the product?
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.
From a useful outline to team work
Explore TeamBoostAI for your team
Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Request TeamBoostAI access
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.