Workflow model reviews / Delivery leads, planning owners and acceptance reviewers

Decision ledger

Bridge review evidence after a workflow model changes

Identify which earlier paths remain valid and which newly allowed paths need evidence.

The artifact bridges changed graph edges across versions rather than copying an acceptance label or updating documentation.

Request TeamBoostAI access Get the work brief Task table (.csv)

Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.

Original worked case · Manual planning resource

Inspect the decision, not just the summary.

Start with the invented evidence, follow the reasoning, and retain its limits when adapting the brief.

01 · Inspect the inputs

Every record stays visible

Inspect the invented case records
Edge	v1 status	v2 status	Evidence action
A → B	Allowed	Retained	Check applicability of old proof
B → C	Allowed	Removed	Historical only; not new-route proof
B → D	Absent	Added	New check
D → C	Absent	Added	New check

Use horizontal scrolling for wide tables. These records are invented, not customer data.

Records · CSV Complete case · JSON Manual brief · Markdown

02 · Follow the reasoning

How the case leads to a decision

v2’s declared edge set has three edges. Only A→B is shared with v1. Old B→C success reaches the same C endpoint but does not traverse the new intermediate D or its outgoing edge.

The bounded result

Retain applicable A→B evidence with its original version and inspect it against v2. The removed B→C route cannot prove either new v2 edge; plan B→D and D→C checks explicitly.

Definitions and method context

Records, decisions and policies are original synthetic examples. External references supply context; they do not validate these cases or TeamBoostAI capabilities.

NIST: state-based and event-sequence testing context ↗
General context for state-based and event-sequence testing. All graphs, guards, fixtures and recovery contracts here are original toy definitions; the source does not certify their completeness or product behavior.

External references checked 6 October 2026. Demand for these topics has not been measured.

Keep the reason with the decision

Illustrative decision record

Synthetic planning case: Model v1 permits A→B and B→C. Model v2 retains A→B, removes B→C, and adds B→D and D→C. Existing passing traces all name v1.

Decision 01

Retained edge

Rationale and evidence: A → B
Revisit condition: Check old-proof applicability

Decision 02

Removed edge

Rationale and evidence: B → C
Revisit condition: Preserve as historical evidence

Decision 03

Added route

Rationale and evidence: B → D → C
Revisit condition: Assign two new transition checks

Decision to make: Retain applicable A→B evidence with its original version and inspect it against v2. The removed B→C route cannot prove either new v2 edge; plan B→D and D→C checks explicitly.

Record both model identities

Owner role · Model owner

Evidence: The retained, removed and added edges are explicit.

Check evidence applicability edge by edge

Owner role · Reviewer

Evidence: Same endpoint C is not substituted for proof of passing through D.

Rehearse the changed route

Owner role · Delivery owner

Evidence: v2 traces include B→D→C with intermediate evidence.

Filled manual planning note

Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.

Retain applicable A→B evidence with its original version and inspect it against v2. The removed B→C route cannot prove either new v2 edge; plan B→D and D→C checks explicitly. v2’s declared edge set has three edges. Only A→B is shared with v1. Old B→C success reaches the same C endpoint but does not traverse the new intermediate D or its outgoing edge. Model version tags identify invented contracts, not product release compatibility or complete proof of unchanged behavior.

Put the outline to work

Record both model identities. Check: The retained, removed and added edges are explicit.
Check evidence applicability edge by edge. Check: Same endpoint C is not substituted for proof of passing through D.
Rehearse the changed route. Check: v2 traces include B→D→C with intermediate evidence.

Questions about this workflow

Must every old result be discarded?

No. Relevant retained behavior may keep evidence after an applicability check.

Is an unchanged final outcome enough?

No when the accepted model requires new intermediate behavior.

Does this create tasks in the product?

No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.

From a useful outline to team work

Explore TeamBoostAI for your team

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.

Request TeamBoostAI access