Declare sequence length and graph
Owner role · Model planner
Evidence: The objective is two consecutive edges, not every arbitrary trace.
Workflow model reviews / Delivery leads, planning owners and acceptance reviewers
Drafting workbenchCover declared two-edge sequences without calling single-edge coverage sufficient.
The artifact enumerates ordered adjacent-edge obligations rather than unordered factor combinations or isolated transition counts.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Original worked case · Manual planning resource
Start with the invented evidence, follow the reasoning, and retain its limits when adapting the brief.
01 · Inspect the inputs
| Sequence | Edges in order | Current sequence evidence |
|---|---|---|
| A → B → A | A→B then B→A | None |
| A → B → C | A→B then B→C | None |
| B → A → B | B→A then A→B | None |
Use horizontal scrolling for wide tables. These records are invented, not customer data.
02 · Follow the reasoning
Compose each edge with edges whose origin matches its destination. A→B has two continuations; B→A has one; B→C has none. Therefore 2+1+0=3 legal length-two sequences.
There are three legal two-edge sequences: A→B→A, A→B→C and B→A→B. All need sequence evidence under the declared two-edge objective; isolated edge results do not provide it.
Records, decisions and policies are original synthetic examples. External references supply context; they do not validate these cases or TeamBoostAI capabilities.
NIST: state-based and event-sequence testing context ↗
General context for state-based and event-sequence testing. All graphs, guards, fixtures and recovery contracts here are original toy definitions; the source does not certify their completeness or product behavior.
External references checked 6 October 2026. Demand for these topics has not been measured.
Synthetic planning case: A model has edges A→B, B→A and B→C. Separate tests exercise each edge, but no trace retains two consecutive transitions. C has no outgoing edge.
Owner role · Model planner
Evidence: The objective is two consecutive edges, not every arbitrary trace.
Owner role · Reviewer
Evidence: Only destination-to-origin matches generate the three listed sequences.
Owner role · Rehearsal owner
Evidence: Each check preserves the intermediate state and ordered pair rather than joining unrelated tests.
Decision to make: There are three legal two-edge sequences: A→B→A, A→B→C and B→A→B. All need sequence evidence under the declared two-edge objective; isolated edge results do not provide it.
Use the downloaded brief as planning input. AI suggestions remain proposals; review scope, owners and acceptance evidence yourself.
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
There are three legal two-edge sequences: A→B→A, A→B→C and B→A→B. All need sequence evidence under the declared two-edge objective; isolated edge results do not provide it. Compose each edge with edges whose origin matches its destination. A→B has two continuations; B→A has one; B→C has none. Therefore 2+1+0=3 legal length-two sequences. No full state-space or software defect coverage is claimed. This is a tiny external graph.
From a useful outline to team work
Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Not as a continuous two-edge trace unless the shared intermediate state and continuity are actually established.
No. The explicitly chosen objective is length two.
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.