TeamBoostWORKFLOW LIBRARY

Workflow model reviews / Delivery leads, planning owners and acceptance reviewers

Dependency map

Plan review coverage for allowed task transitions

Track which model edges have been exercised rather than counting example tasks.

The artifact distinguishes transition coverage from repeated case volume with a fully enumerated graph.

Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.

Original worked case · Manual planning resource

Inspect the decision, not just the summary.

Start with the invented evidence, follow the reasoning, and retain its limits when adapting the brief.

01 · Inspect the inputs

Every record stays visible

Inspect the invented case records
Declared transitionRecorded casesCoverage
Pending → ready3Exercised
Ready → accepted3Exercised
Ready → pending0Unexercised
Pending → cancelled0Unexercised

Use horizontal scrolling for wide tables. These records are invented, not customer data.

02 · Follow the reasoning

How the case leads to a decision

The unique exercised edge set has size two, while the declared edge set has size four: 2/4 coverage in this model. Case repetitions do not increase unique transition coverage.

The bounded result

Two of four declared transitions have rehearsal evidence. Preserve ready→pending and pending→cancelled as unexercised obligations rather than counting six cases as complete transition coverage.

Definitions and method context

Records, decisions and policies are original synthetic examples. External references supply context; they do not validate these cases or TeamBoostAI capabilities.

NIST: state-based and event-sequence testing context ↗
General context for state-based and event-sequence testing. All graphs, guards, fixtures and recovery contracts here are original toy definitions; the source does not certify their completeness or product behavior.

External references checked 6 October 2026. Demand for these topics has not been measured.

Unblock the receiving work

Illustrative dependency map

Synthetic planning case: An external rehearsal model declares pending→ready, ready→accepted, ready→pending and pending→cancelled. Six recorded cases exercise only the first two edges.

Forward route

Required input
Pending → ready → accepted
Receiving condition
Two distinct edges exercised

Return route

Required input
Ready → pending
Receiving condition
Missing rehearsal

Cancellation route

Required input
Pending → cancelled
Receiving condition
Missing rehearsal

Decision to make: Two of four declared transitions have rehearsal evidence. Preserve ready→pending and pending→cancelled as unexercised obligations rather than counting six cases as complete transition coverage.

01

Freeze states and allowed edges

Owner role · Model owner

Evidence: The four edges are an explicit external contract.

02

Map traces to unique edges

Owner role · Rehearsal reviewer

Evidence: The six runs cover only two declared transitions.

03

Assign missing-edge rehearsals

Owner role · Acceptance lead

Evidence: Both remaining transitions have an expected state and an owned check.

Filled manual planning note

Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.

Two of four declared transitions have rehearsal evidence. Preserve ready→pending and pending→cancelled as unexercised obligations rather than counting six cases as complete transition coverage. The unique exercised edge set has size two, while the declared edge set has size four: 2/4 coverage in this model. Case repetitions do not increase unique transition coverage. This invented state model does not describe native TeamBoostAI status transitions or complete test assurance.

Put the outline to work

  1. Freeze states and allowed edges. Check: The four edges are an explicit external contract.
  2. Map traces to unique edges. Check: The six runs cover only two declared transitions.
  3. Assign missing-edge rehearsals. Check: Both remaining transitions have an expected state and an owned check.

Questions about this workflow

Does every edge need just one run?

Not necessarily. Edge coverage is a count; input variation, guards and sequence behavior are additional dimensions.

Does full edge coverage prove the model is correct?

No. The declared model itself can omit required behavior.

Does this create tasks in the product?

No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.

From a useful outline to team work

Explore TeamBoostAI for your team

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.

Request TeamBoostAI access

Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.