Reconcile accepted records
Owner role · Report owner
Evidence: All four accepted IDs remain in the coverage ledger.
Reporting decisions / Delivery leads and report reviewers
Drafting workbenchShow how many accepted records have usable start/finish evidence before summarizing their durations.
Coverage of the duration sample is a reporting decision separate from choosing a clock boundary or calculating open-item age.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Synthetic case: Four items were accepted; A and B have ordered starts and finishes, C lacks a start and D has a start after its finish.
Owner role · Report owner
Evidence: All four accepted IDs remain in the coverage ledger.
Owner role · Reviewer
Evidence: Ordered known timestamps qualify; missing/reversed pairs are separate exceptions.
Owner role · Lead
Evidence: Two-of-four coverage accompanies any duration summary.
Decision to make: Report two usable durations out of four accepted records and disclose both excluded cases; do not assign zero to missing or reversed starts.
Use the downloaded brief as planning input. AI suggestions remain proposals; review scope, owners and acceptance evidence yourself.
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
Coverage note: two ordered event pairs among four accepted items (50% coverage). C is unknown; D has conflicting timestamps. The usable mean is three hours, not an all-item mean.
From a useful outline to team work
Bring this manual reporting policy and its owned checks into your TeamBoostAI work discussion. Native report/export fields and historical reconstruction depend on your account and implementation; this worksheet does not import or change product records. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
A practical decision workshop
Trace an invented case, preserve the evidence limits, then adapt the manual worksheet to your own decision.
Synthetic example · not customer data
| Item | Start UTC | Finish UTC | Duration treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 10:00 | 12:00 | 2h usable |
| B | 09:00 | 13:00 | 4h usable |
| C | Missing | 14:00 | Unknown duration |
| D | 15:00 | 14:00 | Ordering conflict |
Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.
Download records (.csv) · Download complete decision kit (.json)
Decision explorer
This returns a written example explanation. It does not inspect your records or approve a real report.
Version comparison viewer
Draft: a duration summary for four accepted items.
Coverage note: two ordered event pairs among four accepted items (50% coverage). C is unknown; D has conflicting timestamps. The usable mean is three hours, not an all-item mean.
| Review boundary | Draft to review | Revised example |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Four accepted records assumed usable | Two usable; two explicit exceptions |
| Interpretation | All-item duration claim | Subset-only summary with missingness limits |
Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.
No. It is unknown duration in this policy, not instantaneous delivery.
You may label it as the usable subset, retain two-of-four coverage and avoid generalizing to all work.
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.