TeamBoostWORKFLOW LIBRARY

Reporting decisions / Delivery leads and report reviewers

Drafting workbench

Check administrative closure timestamps before timing work

Distinguish a batch-closure timestamp from the actual finish evidence before reporting task durations.

A current status timestamp need not be the accepted-finish event; this audit prevents an administrative action from silently redefining a clock.

Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.

Prepare a brief for human review

Drafting workbench

Synthetic case: A reviewer accepted work at 16:00 on day 1; an administrator closed the record at 09:00 on day 2. The report currently uses the closure time as acceptance.

01

Locate event evidence

Owner role · Task owner

Evidence: Acceptance and closure have separate dated records.

02

Confirm the selected finish

Owner role · Acceptance reviewer

Evidence: The 16:00 evidence corresponds to the agreed finish criterion.

03

Explain the correction

Owner role · Report owner

Evidence: Six hours under the chosen clock is distinct from 23 hours to administrative closure.

Decision to make: Retain both events and use the documented accepted-finish evidence if it is verified; otherwise mark the chosen clock unresolved.

Use the downloaded brief as planning input. AI suggestions remain proposals; review scope, owners and acceptance evidence yourself.

Filled review note

Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.

Reviewed clock note: 6 elapsed hours to verified reviewer acceptance; 23 hours to administrative closure is a separately labelled span.

Put the outline to work

  1. Write each timestamp’s actual meaning.
  2. Check whether the agreed finish event is evidenced.
  3. Keep the closure action visible without calling it acceptance.

From a useful outline to team work

Explore TeamBoostAI for your team

Bring this manual reporting policy and its owned checks into your TeamBoostAI work discussion. Native report/export fields and historical reconstruction depend on your account and implementation; this worksheet does not import or change product records. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.

Request TeamBoostAI access

Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.

A practical decision workshop

Inspect the example before choosing a rule

Trace an invented case, preserve the evidence limits, then adapt the manual worksheet to your own decision.

Evidence dependency diagram

What must be known first?

Example evidence dependenciesFinish criterion leads to Chosen duration: defines meaning. Acceptance evidence leads to Chosen duration: proves event.Finish criterionAcceptance evidenceChosen duration

Scroll the diagram sideways if needed; every dependency is also written below.

  • Finish criterion → Chosen duration: defines meaning.
  • Acceptance evidence → Chosen duration: proves event.

Synthetic example · not customer data

Inspect the records

Synthetic reporting records
EventUTC timeMeaning
Active startDay 1 10:00Clock start
Reviewer acceptanceDay 1 16:00Candidate finish evidence
Administrative closureDay 2 09:00Separate status action

Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.

Download records (.csv) · Download complete decision kit (.json)

Decision explorer

Choose an evidence situation

This returns a written example explanation. It does not inspect your records or approve a real report.

Choose a situation to read its example explanation.
Read every situation without the interactive tool
Acceptance evidence and clock policy agree
Use the acceptance event and disclose the separate closure timestamp.
Acceptance evidence does not match the policy
Hold the duration correction and resolve the criterion.
Only administrative closure is known
Report that fact without inventing an earlier finish.

Version comparison viewer

Keep the draft and its correction visible

Draft or earlier version · review its limits

Draft: 23 elapsed hours to status closure.

Revised example · limits retained

Reviewed clock note: 6 elapsed hours to verified reviewer acceptance; 23 hours to administrative closure is a separately labelled span.

What the review changes
Review boundaryDraft to reviewRevised example
Event meaningClosure treated as acceptanceAcceptance and closure have separate meanings
Clock selectionLatest status timestampChosen evidenced finish boundary

Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.

Questions about this workflow

Is record closure always the finish?

No. It depends on the agreed workflow and evidence; this example separates two observed actions.

Should I edit the production timestamp from this worksheet?

No. The kit is manual review guidance and performs no product writes.

Does this create tasks in the product?

No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.