Locate event evidence
Owner role · Task owner
Evidence: Acceptance and closure have separate dated records.
Reporting decisions / Delivery leads and report reviewers
Drafting workbenchDistinguish a batch-closure timestamp from the actual finish evidence before reporting task durations.
A current status timestamp need not be the accepted-finish event; this audit prevents an administrative action from silently redefining a clock.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Synthetic case: A reviewer accepted work at 16:00 on day 1; an administrator closed the record at 09:00 on day 2. The report currently uses the closure time as acceptance.
Owner role · Task owner
Evidence: Acceptance and closure have separate dated records.
Owner role · Acceptance reviewer
Evidence: The 16:00 evidence corresponds to the agreed finish criterion.
Owner role · Report owner
Evidence: Six hours under the chosen clock is distinct from 23 hours to administrative closure.
Decision to make: Retain both events and use the documented accepted-finish evidence if it is verified; otherwise mark the chosen clock unresolved.
Use the downloaded brief as planning input. AI suggestions remain proposals; review scope, owners and acceptance evidence yourself.
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
Reviewed clock note: 6 elapsed hours to verified reviewer acceptance; 23 hours to administrative closure is a separately labelled span.
From a useful outline to team work
Bring this manual reporting policy and its owned checks into your TeamBoostAI work discussion. Native report/export fields and historical reconstruction depend on your account and implementation; this worksheet does not import or change product records. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
A practical decision workshop
Trace an invented case, preserve the evidence limits, then adapt the manual worksheet to your own decision.
Evidence dependency diagram
Scroll the diagram sideways if needed; every dependency is also written below.
Synthetic example · not customer data
| Event | UTC time | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Active start | Day 1 10:00 | Clock start |
| Reviewer acceptance | Day 1 16:00 | Candidate finish evidence |
| Administrative closure | Day 2 09:00 | Separate status action |
Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.
Download records (.csv) · Download complete decision kit (.json)
Decision explorer
This returns a written example explanation. It does not inspect your records or approve a real report.
Version comparison viewer
Draft: 23 elapsed hours to status closure.
Reviewed clock note: 6 elapsed hours to verified reviewer acceptance; 23 hours to administrative closure is a separately labelled span.
| Review boundary | Draft to review | Revised example |
|---|---|---|
| Event meaning | Closure treated as acceptance | Acceptance and closure have separate meanings |
| Clock selection | Latest status timestamp | Chosen evidenced finish boundary |
Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.
No. It depends on the agreed workflow and evidence; this example separates two observed actions.
No. The kit is manual review guidance and performs no product writes.
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.