{
  "example_kind": "invented job and manual worksheet",
  "slug": "supplier-handoff-acceptance",
  "title": "Acknowledge a supplier delivery while keeping missing review evidence open",
  "layout": "handover",
  "story": "When a supplier delivers files without the agreed demonstration, I want to acknowledge receipt and name the acceptance gap so correction stays focused.",
  "problem": "Configuration files arrive, but the agreed recovery walkthrough and failure-case demonstration are absent. The supplier asks whether delivery is accepted.",
  "symptoms": [
    "File receipt is treated as acceptance of the whole outcome.",
    "The response invents unrelated new requirements.",
    "The missing evidence has no specific owner or review check."
  ],
  "failed_workaround": "Rejecting everything vaguely creates dispute; accepting everything because the files arrived hides the unreviewed receiving condition.",
  "before": "Files received, so the delivery is accepted.",
  "after": "Receiving note: configuration files were received. Outcome acceptance remains open because the agreed recovery walkthrough and one failure case have not been demonstrated. Please provide those two items through the approved review route. The receiving operator will inspect the agreed recovery behavior before the acceptance decision closes; no unrelated scope is added.",
  "success_check": "Both parties can distinguish received material from the existing missing acceptance evidence and the next bounded review.",
  "choices": [
    [
      "Files arrived but agreed proof is missing",
      "Acknowledge receipt and name the gap",
      "Receiving material does not establish the promised behavior."
    ],
    [
      "The requested proof is outside agreed scope",
      "Resolve the scope change separately",
      "Do not smuggle new work into acceptance wording."
    ],
    [
      "The agreed behavior is demonstrated",
      "Record the receiving verdict",
      "Retain the evidence version behind acceptance."
    ]
  ],
  "route": [
    {
      "label": "Keep acceptance work owned",
      "capability": "task-record",
      "action": "Track the bounded receiving review and correction responsibility.",
      "human_check": "Use the actual agreed acceptance boundary."
    },
    {
      "label": "Attach the gap and evidence route",
      "capability": "task-comment",
      "action": "Record the received files and the two missing demonstrations.",
      "human_check": "File access or receipt alone is not the verdict."
    },
    {
      "label": "Report the resulting acceptance stage",
      "capability": "daily-report",
      "action": "State which evidence is now inspectable and what remains open.",
      "human_check": "The receiving owner supplies the separate acceptance decision."
    }
  ],
  "editor": {
    "heading": "Prepare a receiving brief",
    "fields": [
      {
        "key": "received",
        "label": "What was received",
        "example": "Configuration files",
        "help": "Acknowledge the actual arrival."
      },
      {
        "key": "missing",
        "label": "Agreed evidence still absent",
        "example": "Recovery walkthrough and one failure-case demonstration",
        "help": "Keep the gap bounded."
      },
      {
        "key": "request",
        "label": "Correction request",
        "example": "Provide the two agreed demonstrations through the review route",
        "help": "Do not invent new scope."
      },
      {
        "key": "reviewer",
        "label": "Receiving reviewer",
        "example": "Operating reviewer",
        "help": "Name who will inspect the behavior."
      },
      {
        "key": "close",
        "label": "Acceptance closure",
        "example": "Reviewer verifies the agreed recovery behavior",
        "help": "Define the receiving check, not a file count."
      }
    ],
    "template": "Supplier receiving note\nReceived: {received}.\nStill required: {missing}.\nRequest: {request}.\nReceiving reviewer: {reviewer}.\nClosure evidence: {close}.\nReceipt is acknowledged; outcome acceptance remains a separate decision."
  },
  "limitations": "This is an operational review worksheet, not a supplier-contract interpretation or executable recovery procedure.",
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Restate the agreed receiving boundary",
      "Coordinator",
      "The walkthrough and failure case are existing review requirements."
    ],
    [
      "Inspect what actually arrived",
      "Receiving owner",
      "Configuration receipt is distinguished from missing demonstration evidence."
    ],
    [
      "Request and review the bounded correction",
      "Operating reviewer",
      "The missing behavior is demonstrated through the agreed receiving check."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Can I acknowledge receipt without accepting the result?",
      "Yes. State each boundary clearly so acknowledgment is not misread as the final verdict."
    ],
    [
      "How do I keep the correction request fair?",
      "Name the agreed missing evidence and avoid introducing unrelated requirements through the review note."
    ],
    [
      "Can TeamBoost manage supplier acceptance automatically?",
      "No such automation is established. Its documented tasks and comments can coordinate the correction and record the human review result."
    ]
  ]
}