Define the recovery target
Owner role · Model owner
Evidence: Ready with cleared error is the expected recovery state.
Workflow model reviews / Delivery leads, planning owners and acceptance reviewers
Handover packetPlan a recovery route from a declared exception state
Define where recovery must return without assuming a retry restores the entire workflow.
The artifact checks a recovery transition’s exact target and retained approval obligation.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Put the outline to work
- Define the recovery target. Check: Ready with cleared error is the expected recovery state.
- Inspect retained obligations. Check: Receiving approval is absent after recovery and remains required.
- Assign the next transition check. Check: An approval rehearsal is recorded separately before acceptance is claimed.
Original worked case · Manual planning resource
Inspect the decision, not just the summary.
Start with the invented evidence, follow the reasoning, and retain its limits when adapting the brief.
01 · Inspect the inputs
Every record stays visible
| Stage | State | Error flag | Approval evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| After failed review | Review-error | Set | Absent |
| After recover | Ready | Cleared | Still absent |
| After later approval | Accepted | Cleared | Required separate evidence |
Use horizontal scrolling for wide tables. These records are invented, not customer data.
02 · Follow the reasoning
How the case leads to a decision
Recover changes the error flag and returns the work to a reviewable origin. The accepted terminal requires another declared action; restoration is not completion of that action.
The bounded result
A successful recovery demonstrates review-error→ready with a cleared flag. It does not demonstrate acceptance; retain the separate approval transition and its missing evidence.
Definitions and method context
Records, decisions and policies are original synthetic examples. External references supply context; they do not validate these cases or TeamBoostAI capabilities.
NIST: state-based and event-sequence testing context ↗
General context for state-based and event-sequence testing. All graphs, guards, fixtures and recovery contracts here are original toy definitions; the source does not certify their completeness or product behavior.
External references checked 6 October 2026. Demand for these topics has not been measured.
Prepare an input the receiver can accept
Illustrative handover packetSynthetic planning case: An external model reaches review-error after a failed review attempt. Its recover action restores ready and clears the error flag; a separate receiving approval is still required to reach accepted.
- Packet 01
Recovery target
- Required input
- Ready; error cleared
- Receiving acknowledgment
- Verify both components
- Packet 02
Retained obligation
- Required input
- Receiving approval
- Receiving acknowledgment
- Still absent after recovery
- Packet 03
Final acceptance
- Required input
- Separate approved transition
- Receiving acknowledgment
- Do not infer from recovery success
Decision to make: A successful recovery demonstrates review-error→ready with a cleared flag. It does not demonstrate acceptance; retain the separate approval transition and its missing evidence.
Inspect retained obligations
Owner role · Reviewer
Evidence: Receiving approval is absent after recovery and remains required.
Assign the next transition check
Owner role · Delivery owner
Evidence: An approval rehearsal is recorded separately before acceptance is claimed.
Filled manual planning note
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
A successful recovery demonstrates review-error→ready with a cleared flag. It does not demonstrate acceptance; retain the separate approval transition and its missing evidence. Recover changes the error flag and returns the work to a reviewable origin. The accepted terminal requires another declared action; restoration is not completion of that action. This is an invented recovery model, not an API retry recipe or native TeamBoostAI error behavior.
From a useful outline to team work
Explore TeamBoostAI for your team
Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Request TeamBoostAI access
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Questions about this workflow
Does clearing the error mean the review passed?
No. It establishes recovery under this contract, not the later approval outcome.
Can a model recover directly to accepted?
Only if that is its actual declared contract with supporting evidence; this example does not.
Does this create tasks in the product?
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.