{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "runbook-branch-coverage-review",
  "title": "Inspect which runbook branches were exercised",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: An external operating runbook has ordinary input, missing input and conflicting input branches. Three rehearsal cases all follow the ordinary branch successfully.",
  "layout": "protocol",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Declared runbook branch",
      "Rehearsal cases",
      "Expected receiving decision"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "Ordinary input",
        "3 successful",
        "Continue to next stage"
      ],
      [
        "Missing input",
        "0",
        "Hold and request named input"
      ],
      [
        "Conflicting input",
        "0",
        "Resolve governing version before continuation"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "Three successful cases map to one branch, not three distinct branch obligations. Branch coverage is 1/3 under this declared runbook model.",
  "result": "Only one of three declared branches has rehearsal evidence. Preserve the two unexercised branches and plan their specific receiving outcomes before claiming runbook coverage.",
  "boundary": "The decision checks declared runbook-route coverage rather than general attendance or knowledge transfer.",
  "limitations": "This manual runbook model is synthetic and does not certify operational competence or safety.",
  "sources": [
    "original"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Freeze the branching conditions",
      "Runbook owner",
      "Ordinary, missing and conflicting inputs have explicit routes."
    ],
    [
      "Map cases to actual routes",
      "Rehearsal recorder",
      "All three completed cases are ordinary-input executions."
    ],
    [
      "Exercise the missing routes",
      "Receiving reviewer",
      "A missing-input hold and a version-conflict decision get their own bounded evidence."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Does one branch need only one case?",
      "Not universally. Branch coverage counts routes; quality and variation within a route may need more evidence."
    ],
    [
      "Do successful ordinary rehearsals prove exceptions work?",
      "No. The exception routes have not been exercised."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "original",
      "title": "Original worked-case definitions",
      "scope": "Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed."
    }
  ]
}