{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "review-sample-selection-ledger",
  "title": "Preserve how a review sample was selected",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: A recorded draw selects cases A,C,E from a six-case inventory A–F. Before review, C is unavailable; the coordinator substitutes easier case B while the final report still says the original draw was reviewed.",
  "layout": "protocol",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Case",
      "Original draw",
      "Actually reviewed",
      "Selection history"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "A",
        "Selected",
        "Yes",
        "Original selection retained"
      ],
      [
        "C",
        "Selected",
        "No",
        "Unavailable; no review evidence"
      ],
      [
        "E",
        "Selected",
        "Yes",
        "Original selection retained"
      ],
      [
        "B",
        "Not selected",
        "Yes",
        "Ease-based replacement for C"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "The original and actual sets each contain three cases but differ in one identity: C was removed and B added. Two of three original selections were reviewed. The changed inclusion process must be reported rather than relabelled as an unchanged draw.",
  "result": "The actual reviewed set is A,B,E, not A,C,E. Preserve the original draw, C’s nonreview and the convenience replacement B. Equal final sample size does not preserve the recorded selection procedure.",
  "boundary": "This audits draw-to-review inclusion history and substitutions, distinct from allocating a review to missing consequence strata.",
  "limitations": "The inventory is invented. No population representativeness or statistical correction is established; replacement rules need a justified actual design.",
  "sources": [
    "original"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Retain original selection identities",
      "Review coordinator",
      "A,C,E and the stated draw procedure are recorded before substitutions."
    ],
    [
      "Document nonreview and replacement",
      "Recorder",
      "C’s absence and B’s ease-based inclusion remain visible with reasons."
    ],
    [
      "Describe the actual evidence scope",
      "Reviewer",
      "The report names reviewed A,B,E and does not attribute B to the original draw."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Does an equal sample size preserve the method?",
      "No. Which cases entered and why can change even when the count is unchanged."
    ],
    [
      "Does this prove the original draw was random?",
      "No. The worksheet preserves a recorded procedure and identities; randomization itself requires evidence."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "original",
      "title": "Original worked-case definitions",
      "scope": "Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed."
    }
  ]
}