{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "review-risk-strata-allocation",
  "title": "Allocate review across stated risk strata",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: A toy change inventory has twenty routine copy changes and two changes to a critical receiving instruction. A ten-item convenience review selects only routine changes.",
  "layout": "allocation",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Declared stratum",
      "Inventory items",
      "Reviewed items",
      "Remaining"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "Routine copy",
        "20",
        "10",
        "10"
      ],
      [
        "Receiving instruction",
        "2",
        "0",
        "2"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "The review covers 10/22 items overall but 0/2 of the declared instruction stratum. Overall sample size hides the completely missing class.",
  "result": "The ten reviewed items leave the entire two-item instruction stratum unreviewed. Plan evidence by the declared consequence classes instead of treating ten reviewed items as adequate coverage.",
  "boundary": "The decision allocates review across materially different consequence strata.",
  "limitations": "Risk classes and required review are declared local inputs. This worksheet is not a statistical acceptance-sampling standard.",
  "sources": [
    "original"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Define consequence classes",
      "Receiving owner",
      "Instruction changes have a distinct required review consequence under the brief."
    ],
    [
      "Inspect selected items by class",
      "Review coordinator",
      "The selected ten all belong to routine copy."
    ],
    [
      "Assign missing class evidence",
      "Acceptance lead",
      "Both instruction changes receive the required review before the sample is used to support release."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Does this specify a universal sample size?",
      "No. Coverage follows the actual requirements and consequences, not a fixed percentage."
    ],
    [
      "Can a large routine sample stand in for another class?",
      "Not without an appropriate design and claim; this convenience sample supplies neither."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "original",
      "title": "Original worked-case definitions",
      "scope": "Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed."
    }
  ]
}