{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "review-rework-reserve-scenario",
  "title": "Reserve capacity for a stated revision scenario",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: A proof-review plan has eight hours. Four initial reviews need one hour each; the declared contingency allows two revised proofs at 1.5 hours each.",
  "layout": "allocation",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Review stage",
      "Count",
      "Hours each",
      "Demand"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "Initial proofs",
        "4",
        "1",
        "4 hours"
      ],
      [
        "Allowed revision scenario",
        "2",
        "1.5",
        "3 hours"
      ],
      [
        "Available capacity",
        "1 pool",
        "8",
        "8 hours"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "4×1+2×1.5=7 review-hours; 8−7=1 remaining. This is a specified scenario, not an inferred probability or a universal reserve percentage.",
  "result": "The named contingency totals seven review-hours: four initial plus three revision hours. One hour remains under that scenario, with additional revisions unresolved.",
  "boundary": "The decision budgets a declared revision workload and its specific capacity trigger.",
  "limitations": "Observed revision frequency is unknown. Do not turn this stated contingency into a reliability or delivery guarantee.",
  "sources": [
    "schedule"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "State the revision scenario",
      "Review owner",
      "Two revised proofs at 1.5 hours each are the explicit contingency."
    ],
    [
      "Protect initial and revision time",
      "Scheduler",
      "Seven hours are charged against the eight-hour review pool."
    ],
    [
      "Name the excess trigger",
      "Delivery lead",
      "A third revision triggers replanning rather than an automatic commitment."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Does one spare hour cover a third full revision?",
      "No. A further 1.5-hour revision would need more capacity or a changed window."
    ],
    [
      "Is this a recommended rework percentage?",
      "No. The counts and durations are assumptions for this one planning exercise."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "schedule",
      "title": "GAO Schedule Assessment Guide",
      "url": "https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-16-89g",
      "scope": "General schedule-model context. All records, local policies and arithmetic are original toy examples, not a certified or optimized schedule."
    }
  ]
}