{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "requirement-evidence-coverage-matrix",
  "title": "Trace requirements to observed acceptance evidence",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: An accepted brief has requirements R1,R2 and R 3. Check C1 supplies evidence for R1 and C2 also for R1; C3 supplies R2. All three checks pass, but none addresses R3.",
  "layout": "protocol",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Check",
      "Mapped requirement",
      "Observed toy result"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "C1",
        "R1",
        "Pass"
      ],
      [
        "C2",
        "R1",
        "Pass"
      ],
      [
        "C3",
        "R2",
        "Pass"
      ],
      [
        "No mapped check",
        "R3",
        "Uncovered"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "Unique covered requirements are {R1,R2}, so coverage is 2/3 under this mapping. The three passed checks are not three distinct requirement outcomes.",
  "result": "Two of three requirements have mapped acceptance evidence. Three passing checks do not establish coverage of the unreviewed R3 obligation.",
  "boundary": "The artifact evaluates requirement-to-evidence coverage rather than counting passed checks.",
  "limitations": "The mapping can be wrong or incomplete. A linked passing check does not prove the requirement unless its evidence actually addresses it.",
  "sources": [
    "original"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Confirm accepted requirement identities",
      "Scope owner",
      "R1,R2 and R 3 remain distinct required outcomes."
    ],
    [
      "Trace each check to its actual claim",
      "Reviewer",
      "Two checks map to R1, one to R2 and none to R3."
    ],
    [
      "Plan the missing acceptance evidence",
      "Delivery owner",
      "An owned R3 check is supplied before declaring all required outcomes reviewed."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Can several checks support one requirement?",
      "Yes. That may deepen evidence, but it does not automatically cover another requirement."
    ],
    [
      "Is 2/3 a product-quality score?",
      "No. It is this explicit mapping count; requirement importance and evidence quality are separate."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "original",
      "title": "Original worked-case definitions",
      "scope": "Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed."
    }
  ]
}