Preserve lifecycle events
Owner role · Task owner
Evidence: Both acceptance events and the reopen event remain dated.
Reporting decisions / Delivery leads and report reviewers
Drafting workbenchKeep the first accepted cycle and the later repair interval visible when deciding how to describe reopened work.
This is a duration policy across lifecycle episodes, distinct from restating a closed-period count or triaging the new defect.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Synthetic case: An item starts 09:00, is accepted 14:00, reopens 16:00 and is reaccepted 19:00 on one UTC day.
Owner role · Task owner
Evidence: Both acceptance events and the reopen event remain dated.
Owner role · Lead
Evidence: The rule distinguishes first cycle, repair episode and whole span.
Owner role · Reviewer
Evidence: 5h + 3h episodes are not described as 10h of active effort.
Decision to make: Show a 5-hour first cycle and a 3-hour repair interval; name a 10-hour first-start-to-final-acceptance span separately if needed.
Use the downloaded brief as planning input. AI suggestions remain proposals; review scope, owners and acceptance evidence yourself.
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
Lifecycle note: first accepted cycle 5h; later repair interval 3h; total first-start-to-final-acceptance span 10h includes a 2h gap.
From a useful outline to team work
Bring this manual reporting policy and its owned checks into your TeamBoostAI work discussion. Native report/export fields and historical reconstruction depend on your account and implementation; this worksheet does not import or change product records. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
A practical decision workshop
Trace an invented case, preserve the evidence limits, then adapt the manual worksheet to your own decision.
Version comparison viewer
Draft: one 10-hour task duration with no episode context.
Lifecycle note: first accepted cycle 5h; later repair interval 3h; total first-start-to-final-acceptance span 10h includes a 2h gap.
| Review boundary | Draft to review | Revised example |
|---|---|---|
| Duration unit | Single unlabeled span | Separate episodes and whole-span rule |
| History | Earlier acceptance overwritten | Both acceptance events retained |
Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.
Synthetic example · not customer data
| Episode | UTC interval | Elapsed time |
|---|---|---|
| First episode | 09:00–14:00 | 5h |
| Gap after acceptance | 14:00–16:00 | 2h |
| Repair episode | 16:00–19:00 | 3h |
Wide tables scroll sideways on small screens.
Download records (.csv) · Download complete decision kit (.json)
Decision explorer
This returns a written example explanation. It does not inspect your records or approve a real report.
The whole span includes the two-hour accepted-to-reopened gap; the selected episodes do not.
That requires a separate counted-unit policy; a duration alone does not determine throughput.
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.