{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "pilot-metric-tradeoff-gate",
  "title": "Review a pilot's speed and quality together",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: A local pilot requires zero incorrect dates in final proofs. The proposed process changes mean completion from ten to eight toy minutes but produces two incorrect dates among ten proofs.",
  "layout": "protocol",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Measure",
      "Earlier toy process",
      "Proposed toy process",
      "Declared decision role"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "Mean minutes",
        "10",
        "8",
        "Speed observation"
      ],
      [
        "Incorrect dates",
        "0 of 10",
        "2 of 10",
        "Zero-error local guardrail"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "Mean time decreases two minutes, while observed incorrect-date count rises from zero to two. A speed gain does not compensate for the separately declared hard guardrail.",
  "result": "The faster mean does not meet the declared accuracy guardrail. Hold the broad adoption decision while investigating the date failures and preserving the observed timing result.",
  "boundary": "This evaluates a process adoption decision across speed and an explicit outcome guardrail, rather than scoring one artifact’s preferences.",
  "limitations": "The guardrail is supplied, not a universal standard. Causation, future performance and broader work contexts remain unverified.",
  "sources": [
    "nist"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Verify the adoption guardrail",
      "Receiving owner",
      "Zero incorrect dates is the accepted local condition for this pilot decision."
    ],
    [
      "Retain both observations",
      "Pilot reviewer",
      "Eight-minute mean and two failed date cases appear together."
    ],
    [
      "Investigate before adoption",
      "Process owner",
      "The incorrect-date fixtures receive a bounded correction and fresh guardrail review."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Does this mean speed never matters?",
      "No. It matters within the accepted decision rules; here it cannot waive the separate guardrail."
    ],
    [
      "Do ten invented proofs establish a defect rate?",
      "No. The counts describe this toy cohort, not population reliability."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "nist",
      "title": "NIST combinatorial testing",
      "url": "https://www.nist.gov/publications/combinatorial-testing",
      "scope": "Combination-coverage context. Invented review/state examples do not prove full fault coverage, certification or product behavior."
    }
  ]
}