{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "forecast-work-class-eligibility",
  "title": "Check a forecast's work-class eligibility",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: A documented toy forecast rule is for a single ready proof review with known inputs. The proposed evaluation includes A:ready proof, B:proof with missing input and C:fixture migration.",
  "layout": "protocol",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Case",
      "Work class",
      "Input condition",
      "Rule eligibility"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "A",
        "Single proof review",
        "Known and ready",
        "Eligible"
      ],
      [
        "B",
        "Single proof review",
        "Required input missing",
        "Outside context"
      ],
      [
        "C",
        "Fixture migration",
        "Known input",
        "Wrong work class"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "Eligibility is the conjunction of the stated work class and ready-known inputs. A meets both; B fails input readiness and C the class condition. One eligible case is not an accuracy study.",
  "result": "Only A meets the declared forecast context. Keep B and C as ineligible cases for this rule rather than reporting their errors as if the rule targeted them.",
  "boundary": "The decision checks model applicability before computing performance on unrelated or unready work.",
  "limitations": "No native TeamBoostAI forecast, entitlement or real model deployment is asserted. The rule is an external manual example.",
  "sources": [
    "forecast"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Read the forecast context",
      "Model reviewer",
      "The rule’s target class and required input state are documented before evaluation."
    ],
    [
      "Classify proposed evaluation cases",
      "Recorder",
      "B and C have explicit eligibility exclusions, not silently missing scores."
    ],
    [
      "Choose a proper evaluation cohort",
      "Planning lead",
      "Future comparisons retain the same target definition or explicitly revise the rule."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Can an ineligible case still reveal a useful limitation?",
      "Yes. It exposes unsupported scope, but that differs from error on the declared target."
    ],
    [
      "Does one eligible case validate the rule?",
      "No. The worksheet checks applicability, not model performance."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "forecast",
      "title": "Forecasting: Principles and Practice — accuracy",
      "url": "https://otexts.com/fpp3/accuracy.html",
      "scope": "Genuine held-out forecast and point-error evaluation context. Binary scoring examples use their own explicit toy definitions; no real task model is validated."
    }
  ]
}