# Sequence learning around prerequisite skills

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: An advanced archive-recovery practice requires a demonstrated version-identification step. A participant attended orientation but has not shown the required identification task.

## Decision

Hold the advanced practice’s independent execution until the version-identification prerequisite is demonstrated. Orientation attendance is not the specified prerequisite evidence.

## Owned work

- Confirm the actual prerequisite
  - Owner role: Practice owner
  - Acceptance evidence: The recovery task depends on selecting the governing version.
- Inspect foundational proof
  - Owner role: Reviewer
  - Acceptance evidence: The two version fixtures have not yet been demonstrated.
- Arrange the missing practice
  - Owner role: Training coordinator
  - Acceptance evidence: The participant completes the foundation check before an advanced independent attempt is scheduled.

## Workflow

1. Confirm the actual prerequisite. Check: The recovery task depends on selecting the governing version.
2. Inspect foundational proof. Check: The two version fixtures have not yet been demonstrated.
3. Arrange the missing practice. Check: The participant completes the foundation check before an advanced independent attempt is scheduled.

## Judgment

The example describes a local learning protocol, not certification or an assessment of real employees.


## Filled manual planning note

Hold the advanced practice’s independent execution until the version-identification prerequisite is demonstrated. Orientation attendance is not the specified prerequisite evidence. The dependency is a demonstrated foundational task before the advanced one. Counting one completed attendance event does not satisfy the separate task-performance gate. The example describes a local learning protocol, not certification or an assessment of real employees.


## Workflow questions

### Can a supervised introduction still happen?

If the actual protocol permits it, distinguish supervised exposure from independent eligibility.

### Does missing proof mean inability?

No. It is an unverified prerequisite, not a conclusion about ability.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Learning stage | Required proof | Current evidence
--- | --- | ---
Orientation | Attendance | Recorded
Version identification | Correct governing version on two supplied fixtures | Unverified
Advanced recovery practice | Version identification demonstrated first | Not yet eligible

### Reasoning

The dependency is a demonstrated foundational task before the advanced one. Counting one completed attendance event does not satisfy the separate task-performance gate.

### Bounded result

Hold the advanced practice’s independent execution until the version-identification prerequisite is demonstrated. Orientation attendance is not the specified prerequisite evidence.

### Distinct decision

This plans a prerequisite learning chain, distinct from general onboarding attendance or broad knowledge coverage.

### Limits

The example describes a local learning protocol, not certification or an assessment of real employees.

### Definitions and method context

- Original worked-case definitions — Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.