# Inspect which runbook branches were exercised

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: An external operating runbook has ordinary input, missing input and conflicting input branches. Three rehearsal cases all follow the ordinary branch successfully.

## Decision

Only one of three declared branches has rehearsal evidence. Preserve the two unexercised branches and plan their specific receiving outcomes before claiming runbook coverage.

## Owned work

- Freeze the branching conditions
  - Owner role: Runbook owner
  - Acceptance evidence: Ordinary, missing and conflicting inputs have explicit routes.
- Map cases to actual routes
  - Owner role: Rehearsal recorder
  - Acceptance evidence: All three completed cases are ordinary-input executions.
- Exercise the missing routes
  - Owner role: Receiving reviewer
  - Acceptance evidence: A missing-input hold and a version-conflict decision get their own bounded evidence.

## Workflow

1. Freeze the branching conditions. Check: Ordinary, missing and conflicting inputs have explicit routes.
2. Map cases to actual routes. Check: All three completed cases are ordinary-input executions.
3. Exercise the missing routes. Check: A missing-input hold and a version-conflict decision get their own bounded evidence.

## Judgment

This manual runbook model is synthetic and does not certify operational competence or safety.


## Filled manual planning note

Only one of three declared branches has rehearsal evidence. Preserve the two unexercised branches and plan their specific receiving outcomes before claiming runbook coverage. Three successful cases map to one branch, not three distinct branch obligations. Branch coverage is 1/3 under this declared runbook model. This manual runbook model is synthetic and does not certify operational competence or safety.


## Workflow questions

### Does one branch need only one case?

Not universally. Branch coverage counts routes; quality and variation within a route may need more evidence.

### Do successful ordinary rehearsals prove exceptions work?

No. The exception routes have not been exercised.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Declared runbook branch | Rehearsal cases | Expected receiving decision
--- | --- | ---
Ordinary input | 3 successful | Continue to next stage
Missing input | 0 | Hold and request named input
Conflicting input | 0 | Resolve governing version before continuation

### Reasoning

Three successful cases map to one branch, not three distinct branch obligations. Branch coverage is 1/3 under this declared runbook model.

### Bounded result

Only one of three declared branches has rehearsal evidence. Preserve the two unexercised branches and plan their specific receiving outcomes before claiming runbook coverage.

### Distinct decision

The decision checks declared runbook-route coverage rather than general attendance or knowledge transfer.

### Limits

This manual runbook model is synthetic and does not certify operational competence or safety.

### Definitions and method context

- Original worked-case definitions — Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.