# Allocate review across stated risk strata

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: A toy change inventory has twenty routine copy changes and two changes to a critical receiving instruction. A ten-item convenience review selects only routine changes.

## Decision

The ten reviewed items leave the entire two-item instruction stratum unreviewed. Plan evidence by the declared consequence classes instead of treating ten reviewed items as adequate coverage.

## Owned work

- Define consequence classes
  - Owner role: Receiving owner
  - Acceptance evidence: Instruction changes have a distinct required review consequence under the brief.
- Inspect selected items by class
  - Owner role: Review coordinator
  - Acceptance evidence: The selected ten all belong to routine copy.
- Assign missing class evidence
  - Owner role: Acceptance lead
  - Acceptance evidence: Both instruction changes receive the required review before the sample is used to support release.

## Workflow

1. Define consequence classes. Check: Instruction changes have a distinct required review consequence under the brief.
2. Inspect selected items by class. Check: The selected ten all belong to routine copy.
3. Assign missing class evidence. Check: Both instruction changes receive the required review before the sample is used to support release.

## Judgment

Risk classes and required review are declared local inputs. This worksheet is not a statistical acceptance-sampling standard.


## Filled manual planning note

The ten reviewed items leave the entire two-item instruction stratum unreviewed. Plan evidence by the declared consequence classes instead of treating ten reviewed items as adequate coverage. The review covers 10/22 items overall but 0/2 of the declared instruction stratum. Overall sample size hides the completely missing class. Risk classes and required review are declared local inputs. This worksheet is not a statistical acceptance-sampling standard.


## Workflow questions

### Does this specify a universal sample size?

No. Coverage follows the actual requirements and consequences, not a fixed percentage.

### Can a large routine sample stand in for another class?

Not without an appropriate design and claim; this convenience sample supplies neither.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Declared stratum | Inventory items | Reviewed items | Remaining
--- | --- | --- | ---
Routine copy | 20 | 10 | 10
Receiving instruction | 2 | 0 | 2

### Reasoning

The review covers 10/22 items overall but 0/2 of the declared instruction stratum. Overall sample size hides the completely missing class.

### Bounded result

The ten reviewed items leave the entire two-item instruction stratum unreviewed. Plan evidence by the declared consequence classes instead of treating ten reviewed items as adequate coverage.

### Distinct decision

The decision allocates review across materially different consequence strata.

### Limits

Risk classes and required review are declared local inputs. This worksheet is not a statistical acceptance-sampling standard.

### Definitions and method context

- Original worked-case definitions — Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.