# Turn incident findings into bounded follow-up work

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Illustrative review: a delivery failed because a required input was absent; recovery is complete, but detection and ownership need follow-up.

## Decision

Choose prevention and verification actions with clear owners after recovery is confirmed.

## Owned work

- Preserve observed findings
  - Owner role: Review lead
  - Acceptance evidence: The brief distinguishes the confirmed missing condition from unproven causes.
- Bound prevention work
  - Owner role: Technical owner
  - Acceptance evidence: The task describes the detection or input check to add.
- Define follow-up verification
  - Owner role: Reviewer
  - Acceptance evidence: A safe test can show whether the prevention action catches the condition.

## Workflow

1. Use the incident record for observed evidence.
2. Keep recovery decisions separate from improvement tasks.
3. Review follow-up acceptance and residual risk with the responsible owner.

## Judgment

For an active incident, follow your organization’s response runbook first. This page does not execute recovery or certify root cause.


## Illustrative delivery brief

Recovery: confirm separately in the incident procedure.
Observed finding: required input was absent.
Follow-up proposal: bounded detection plus a verification case.
Residual risk: record what the action does not address.


## Workflow questions

### Should every hypothesis become a fix?

Investigate unresolved hypotheses before committing an implementation.

### How do we close follow-up work?

Use the agreed evidence that the bounded prevention or verification action works.

## Product connection

Keep recovery evidence separate from prevention tasks when organizing incident follow-up work in TeamBoostAI.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.