# Use a readback to locate a handover interpretation gap

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: The sender’s operating packet says stop at a missing approval and request the named reviewer. The receiver’s readback says continue with the most recent draft, treating silence as approval.

## Decision

The readback exposes a specific stopping-rule conflict. Resolve that divergence and repeat the bounded readback before counting the packet as understood.

## Owned work

- Preserve the two interpretations
  - Owner role: Handoff owner
  - Acceptance evidence: The sender rule and actual receiver restatement are both recorded.
- Resolve the governing stop condition
  - Owner role: Decision owner
  - Acceptance evidence: Missing approval does not become permission through silence under the stated packet.
- Verify the corrected boundary
  - Owner role: Receiving lead
  - Acceptance evidence: A fresh missing-approval example elicits the agreed stop and reviewer request.

## Workflow

1. Preserve the two interpretations. Check: The sender rule and actual receiver restatement are both recorded.
2. Resolve the governing stop condition. Check: Missing approval does not become permission through silence under the stated packet.
3. Verify the corrected boundary. Check: A fresh missing-approval example elicits the agreed stop and reviewer request.

## Judgment

The example uses a supplied local approval rule and synthetic statements; it does not establish product permission enforcement.


## Filled manual planning note

The readback exposes a specific stopping-rule conflict. Resolve that divergence and repeat the bounded readback before counting the packet as understood. The issue is not recall of a task title: the receiver would cross a different action boundary under the same missing-input condition. The example uses a supplied local approval rule and synthetic statements; it does not establish product permission enforcement.


## Working artifact

- Receiving operator / Packet says stop on missing approval / Readback identifies the correct stopping action
- Decision reviewer / Named approval route / Silence is not treated as approval
- Handoff coordinator / Recorded divergent interpretations / Fresh case confirms the repaired boundary


## Workflow questions

### Does repeating the packet word for word prove usable understanding?

Not alone. Ask the receiver to explain the action under the disputed condition.

### Can readback itself grant approval?

No. It checks interpretation, not decision authority or missing acceptance evidence.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Boundary | Sender packet | Receiver readback | Treatment
--- | --- | --- | ---
Missing approval | Stop and request named reviewer | Continue with newest draft | Conflict
Silence | No acceptance evidence | Assumed approval | Unsupported
Next permitted action | Reviewer request | Execution | Must be reconciled

### Reasoning

The issue is not recall of a task title: the receiver would cross a different action boundary under the same missing-input condition.

### Bounded result

The readback exposes a specific stopping-rule conflict. Resolve that divergence and repeat the bounded readback before counting the packet as understood.

### Distinct decision

The artifact repairs an observed sender/receiver divergence about a stopping rule, rather than transferring specialist reasoning generally.

### Limits

The example uses a supplied local approval rule and synthetic statements; it does not establish product permission enforcement.

### Definitions and method context

- Original worked-case definitions — Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.