# Trace an acceptance claim to its original artifact

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: An acceptance note refers to raw fixture version r1, its transformation t1 and a summary s1. The current raw file is r2; the recorded identity chain still points to r1.

## Decision

The old summary may describe r1 correctly but does not establish acceptance of r2. Keep version and transformation links inspectable, then regenerate or re-review the current chain as required.

## Owned work

- Recover source and transformation versions
  - Owner role: Evidence owner
  - Acceptance evidence: The raw snapshot and transformation input/output identities are retained.
- Check current-chain applicability
  - Owner role: Reviewer
  - Acceptance evidence: The acceptance claim explicitly names r1 or a verified r2 chain.
- Rebuild the necessary evidence
  - Owner role: Delivery owner
  - Acceptance evidence: Changed current input receives the appropriate transformation and receiving review; unchanged historical evidence remains labelled.

## Workflow

1. Recover source and transformation versions. Check: The raw snapshot and transformation input/output identities are retained.
2. Check current-chain applicability. Check: The acceptance claim explicitly names r1 or a verified r2 chain.
3. Rebuild the necessary evidence. Check: Changed current input receives the appropriate transformation and receiving review; unchanged historical evidence remains labelled.

## Judgment

r1,t1,s1 are synthetic version identities, not cryptographic proofs or product audit features. The chain records derivation applicability only.


## Filled manual planning note

The old summary may describe r1 correctly but does not establish acceptance of r2. Keep version and transformation links inspectable, then regenerate or re-review the current chain as required. The recorded chain is r1→t1→s1, while the current input is r2. An unchanged copied conclusion cannot bridge that input identity change without evidence. r1,t1,s1 are synthetic version identities, not cryptographic proofs or product audit features. The chain records derivation applicability only.


## Workflow questions

### Do matching identity tags prove the conclusion is correct?

No. They support which artifact was used; relevance, completeness and correctness require separate checks.

### Can a checksum establish trusted authorship?

Not alone. Equal content identity does not establish source authority or truthful interpretation.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Artifact stage | Recorded input identity | Recorded output identity | Current relevance
--- | --- | --- | ---
Raw snapshot | Source capture | r1 | Earlier version
Transformation | r1 | t1 | Derived from earlier raw
Summary | t1 | s1 | Earlier chain
Current raw | Source capture | r2 | Needs its own relevant chain

### Reasoning

The recorded chain is r1→t1→s1, while the current input is r2. An unchanged copied conclusion cannot bridge that input identity change without evidence.

### Bounded result

The old summary may describe r1 correctly but does not establish acceptance of r2. Keep version and transformation links inspectable, then regenerate or re-review the current chain as required.

### Distinct decision

The decision traces input/transform/output version custody, distinct from merely opening a quoted source or counting independent observations.

### Limits

r1,t1,s1 are synthetic version identities, not cryptographic proofs or product audit features. The chain records derivation applicability only.

### Definitions and method context

- Original worked-case definitions — Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.