# Test whether a receiver can find the governing instruction

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: Three synthetic receivers can open the document repository. In a bounded exercise, only one finds the governing v3 archive procedure without a direct link; two find retired v2.

## Decision

Repository access exists, but the current retrieval route succeeds in only one of these three rehearsals. Repair labels or navigation and retest retrieval rather than treating access as demonstrated findability.

## Owned work

- Define the retrieval task
  - Owner role: Knowledge owner
  - Acceptance evidence: The requested action is finding the governing procedure through its ordinary route.
- Observe version selection
  - Owner role: Facilitator
  - Acceptance evidence: Two accessible retired results are distinguished from an access failure.
- Repair and retest the route
  - Owner role: Documentation owner
  - Acceptance evidence: Fresh receivers use the revised labels/navigation without being handed the final direct link.

## Workflow

1. Define the retrieval task. Check: The requested action is finding the governing procedure through its ordinary route.
2. Observe version selection. Check: Two accessible retired results are distinguished from an access failure.
3. Repair and retest the route. Check: Fresh receivers use the revised labels/navigation without being handed the final direct link.

## Judgment

A three-case invented rehearsal cannot validate universal findability. No native search or document feature is asserted.


## Filled manual planning note

Repository access exists, but the current retrieval route succeeds in only one of these three rehearsals. Repair labels or navigation and retest retrieval rather than treating access as demonstrated findability. All three have access, while one locates the intended version in this exercise. The 1/3 descriptive retrieval result is not a representative usability estimate. A three-case invented rehearsal cannot validate universal findability. No native search or document feature is asserted.


## Workflow questions

### Would sending a direct link resolve the immediate task?

It may, but it would not demonstrate that the ordinary discovery route was repaired.

### Does a failed retrieval prove the document is absent?

No. All three could access the repository; discoverability and version selection are the tested conditions.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Receiver case | Repository access | Found without direct link | Treatment
--- | --- | --- | ---
A | Available | Current v3 | Expected retrieval
B | Available | Retired v2 | Wrong governing version
C | Available | Retired v2 | Wrong governing version

### Reasoning

All three have access, while one locates the intended version in this exercise. The 1/3 descriptive retrieval result is not a representative usability estimate.

### Bounded result

Repository access exists, but the current retrieval route succeeds in only one of these three rehearsals. Repair labels or navigation and retest retrieval rather than treating access as demonstrated findability.

### Distinct decision

The decision tests retrieval of the governing version despite working access, distinct from fixing an inaccessible handoff attachment.

### Limits

A three-case invented rehearsal cannot validate universal findability. No native search or document feature is asserted.

### Definitions and method context

- Original worked-case definitions — Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.