# Plan reviews that need an uninterrupted slot

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: A reviewer has three one-hour slots. A design proof needs one uninterrupted two-hour review, with no supported resume boundary.

## Decision

Three total hours do not contain the required two-hour contiguous slot. Arrange a suitable window or change the review protocol before booking the proof.

## Owned work

- Confirm continuity needs
  - Owner role: Acceptance reviewer
  - Acceptance evidence: A two-hour uninterrupted review is required under the actual protocol.
- Inspect individual windows
  - Owner role: Scheduler
  - Acceptance evidence: None of the three windows is two hours long.
- Choose a valid review route
  - Owner role: Design lead
  - Acceptance evidence: A two-hour booking or a genuinely resumable revised protocol is agreed.

## Workflow

1. Confirm continuity needs. Check: A two-hour uninterrupted review is required under the actual protocol.
2. Inspect individual windows. Check: None of the three windows is two hours long.
3. Choose a valid review route. Check: A two-hour booking or a genuinely resumable revised protocol is agreed.

## Judgment

The uninterrupted requirement is an assumption to verify, not a universal rule for design reviews.


## Filled manual planning note

Three total hours do not contain the required two-hour contiguous slot. Arrange a suitable window or change the review protocol before booking the proof. Available total=1+1+1=3 hours; longest contiguous slot=1 hour. The full review requires two, so total capacity alone is insufficient. The uninterrupted requirement is an assumption to verify, not a universal rule for design reviews.


## Workflow questions

### Can I join the three slots on paper?

Only if the review can pause and resume under an agreed protocol; this example explicitly cannot.

### Does the unused hour mean wasted capacity?

No. It may serve other work; it simply does not solve this review’s continuity constraint.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Available slot | Duration | Can hold full review?
--- | --- | ---
09:00–10:00 | 1 hour | No
12:00–13:00 | 1 hour | No
16:00–17:00 | 1 hour | No
Required review | 2 uninterrupted hours | No current slot

### Reasoning

Available total=1+1+1=3 hours; longest contiguous slot=1 hour. The full review requires two, so total capacity alone is insufficient.

### Bounded result

Three total hours do not contain the required two-hour contiguous slot. Arrange a suitable window or change the review protocol before booking the proof.

### Distinct decision

This checks a non-divisible time requirement rather than summing owner availability.

### Limits

The uninterrupted requirement is an assumption to verify, not a universal rule for design reviews.

### Definitions and method context

- GAO Schedule Assessment Guide — https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-16-89g — General schedule-model context. All records, local policies and arithmetic are original toy examples, not a certified or optimized schedule.