# Cap which obligations a backup can take on together

Illustrative planning brief; no automatic product import.

Synthetic planning case: A substitute is qualified for obligations A,B and C. Each needs two hours inside one three-hour coverage window; the draft activates all three together.

## Decision

Qualification for each obligation does not make six hours fit three. At most one complete two-hour obligation fits under this indivisible-window model; prioritize or establish additional eligible coverage explicitly.

## Owned work

- Verify per-obligation qualification
  - Owner role: Operating owner
  - Acceptance evidence: The substitute has actual relevant evidence for A,B and C.
- Check simultaneous coverage demand
  - Owner role: Capacity planner
  - Acceptance evidence: All three draw on the same three-hour window.
- Choose a feasible activation set
  - Owner role: Decision owner
  - Acceptance evidence: The selected complete obligation and uncovered obligations have explicit receiving decisions.

## Workflow

1. Verify per-obligation qualification. Check: The substitute has actual relevant evidence for A,B and C.
2. Check simultaneous coverage demand. Check: All three draw on the same three-hour window.
3. Choose a feasible activation set. Check: The selected complete obligation and uncovered obligations have explicit receiving decisions.

## Judgment

Qualification and duration are supplied assumptions. This is a coverage activation budget, not a judgment of personal capability.


## Filled manual planning note

Qualification for each obligation does not make six hours fit three. At most one complete two-hour obligation fits under this indivisible-window model; prioritize or establish additional eligible coverage explicitly. Total demand=2+2+2=6 hours. Under indivisible two-hour completion, floor(3/2)=1 full obligation, with one hour left; this differs from per-obligation eligibility. Qualification and duration are supplied assumptions. This is a coverage activation budget, not a judgment of personal capability.


## Workflow questions

### Can two obligations share the same two hours?

Not under the separate-demand assumption; any shared execution must be justified with a revised model.

### Is unused one-hour capacity worthless?

No. It may serve permitted partial or other work, but is not another complete two-hour obligation.

## Product connection

Use the owned checks and downloaded brief to discuss this planning decision alongside your TeamBoostAI tasks. Confirm available fields, roles and account features separately. The example is manual; it does not calculate live analytics, create work or run an experiment in the product.

Confirm account availability before adopting this manual outline.

## Original worked case

Synthetic records, manual planning only. No account import or live analytics.

### Inspect the invented case records

Obligation | Qualified substitute | Demand in shared window
--- | --- | ---
A | Same substitute | 2 hours
B | Same substitute | 2 hours
C | Same substitute | 2 hours
Available coverage | Same person | 3 hours

### Reasoning

Total demand=2+2+2=6 hours. Under indivisible two-hour completion, floor(3/2)=1 full obligation, with one hour left; this differs from per-obligation eligibility.

### Bounded result

Qualification for each obligation does not make six hours fit three. At most one complete two-hour obligation fits under this indivisible-window model; prioritize or establish additional eligible coverage explicitly.

### Distinct decision

The artifact caps simultaneous backup obligations after eligibility is already established.

### Limits

Qualification and duration are supplied assumptions. This is a coverage activation budget, not a judgment of personal capability.

### Definitions and method context

- Original worked-case definitions — Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed.