{
  "example_kind": "original synthetic manual planning case",
  "slug": "documentation-findability-rehearsal",
  "title": "Test whether a receiver can find the governing instruction",
  "scenario": "Synthetic planning case: Three synthetic receivers can open the document repository. In a bounded exercise, only one finds the governing v3 archive procedure without a direct link; two find retired v2.",
  "layout": "protocol",
  "dataset": {
    "heading": "Inspect the invented case records",
    "headers": [
      "Receiver case",
      "Repository access",
      "Found without direct link",
      "Treatment"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "A",
        "Available",
        "Current v3",
        "Expected retrieval"
      ],
      [
        "B",
        "Available",
        "Retired v2",
        "Wrong governing version"
      ],
      [
        "C",
        "Available",
        "Retired v2",
        "Wrong governing version"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "derivation": "All three have access, while one locates the intended version in this exercise. The 1/3 descriptive retrieval result is not a representative usability estimate.",
  "result": "Repository access exists, but the current retrieval route succeeds in only one of these three rehearsals. Repair labels or navigation and retest retrieval rather than treating access as demonstrated findability.",
  "boundary": "The decision tests retrieval of the governing version despite working access, distinct from fixing an inaccessible handoff attachment.",
  "limitations": "A three-case invented rehearsal cannot validate universal findability. No native search or document feature is asserted.",
  "sources": [
    "original"
  ],
  "tasks": [
    [
      "Define the retrieval task",
      "Knowledge owner",
      "The requested action is finding the governing procedure through its ordinary route."
    ],
    [
      "Observe version selection",
      "Facilitator",
      "Two accessible retired results are distinguished from an access failure."
    ],
    [
      "Repair and retest the route",
      "Documentation owner",
      "Fresh receivers use the revised labels/navigation without being handed the final direct link."
    ]
  ],
  "faqs": [
    [
      "Would sending a direct link resolve the immediate task?",
      "It may, but it would not demonstrate that the ordinary discovery route was repaired."
    ],
    [
      "Does a failed retrieval prove the document is absent?",
      "No. All three could access the repository; discoverability and version selection are the tested conditions."
    ]
  ],
  "method_references": [
    {
      "id": "original",
      "title": "Original worked-case definitions",
      "scope": "Definitions, policy choices, records and calculations are authored for this worksheet. No external standard, statistical validation or live product measurement is claimed."
    }
  ]
}