Select a consistent sample
Owner role · Report owner
Evidence: Five completed same-type records use the same start/finish boundary and date window.
Work measurement / Team leads and delivery coordinators
Decision deskCalculate a nearest-rank delivery percentile from an invented sample and see why a small history does not guarantee a deadline.
State the sorting and rank convention, preserve sample size and identify the unfinished items omitted from the calculation.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Decision to make: Report the descriptive 80th percentile as six days under nearest-rank and decline to treat it as a calibrated promise.
Synthetic example: Five completed same-type items took 2, 3, 4, 6 and 10 elapsed days under one clock. A draft promises the next item will finish within its sample percentile.
Owner role · Report owner
Evidence: Five completed same-type records use the same start/finish boundary and date window.
Owner role · Analyst role
Evidence: Sorted values and ceiling(0.8×5)=4 are visible; the fourth value is six.
Owner role · Delivery lead
Evidence: The note identifies small-sample limits, unfinished exclusions and changed work conditions.
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
Historical sample note: n=5; nearest-rank p80=6 days. No calibrated future deadline confidence is asserted; check unfinished work and changed conditions.
A worked measurement study
Every record here is synthetic. Use the rule to review your own evidence before taking action.
Invented records · inspect every count
| Completed item | Elapsed days |
|---|---|
| A | 2 |
| B | 3 |
| C | 4 |
| D | 6 |
| E | 10 |
On small screens, scroll a wide table sideways to see all columns.
Download example data (.csv) · Download method worksheet (.json)
Try the arithmetic
Change the invented inputs to explore the rule. Inputs stay in this browser; nothing is sent or saved.
The written example remains below if JavaScript is unavailable. A calculation does not validate a sample, instrument or forecast.
Sorted sample [2,3,4,6,10]; n=5; nearest rank for p=80 is ceiling(0.8×5)=4; selected value=6 days. At p=85 rank=5 and value=10: one rank step changes the result substantially.
Historical sample note: n=5; nearest-rank p80=6 days. No calibrated future deadline confidence is asserted; check unfinished work and changed conditions.
Five completed durations under one clock
Supports a descriptive nearest-rank result.
Future-item completion probability
Do not turn this small sample into a promise.
Inspect unfinished ages and work-type changes
Keep limitations attached to planning use.
Nearest-rank selects position ceiling(0.8×5)=4 in the sorted list: 2,3,4,6,10.
No. It is a descriptive sample value, not calibrated future probability or accepted scope.
No. Report its age separately and disclose the completed-only sample boundary.
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.
From a useful outline to team work
Use this manual measurement rule as context when planning or reviewing owned work in TeamBoostAI. Confirm the fields and reports available in your account; the worksheet is not imported automatically. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.