API contract predecessor
- Required input
- Reviewed response shape and error behavior.
- Receiving condition
- UI owner confirms the contract is usable for integration.
Command-line workflows / Technical planners
Dependency mapPlan a task’s upstream and downstream technical links using verified references and the CLI creation contract.
A dependency needs both a correct task reference and a receiving condition. Distinguish source-supported creation fields from an assumed ability to edit an existing relationship.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.
Illustrative case: a proposed UI task depends on an API contract task. The planner wants that relationship recorded at creation.
Decision to make: Verify both task references and use only the source-supported creation fields in a reviewed proposal.
Owner role · Planner
Evidence: Each dependency refers to the intended task in the same verified context.
Owner role · Receiving owner
Evidence: The required deliverable and acceptance condition are explicit.
Owner role · CLI author
Evidence: The creation brief follows prevTechDepIds/nextTechDepIds contract; update support is not assumed.
Invented planning text. Adapt it to your evidence and confirmed owners.
Synthetic link: UI integration waits for the reviewed API response contract, not simply a task marked done. The creation proposal references the verified predecessor. No dependency edit is assumed for an already saved task.
| Condition | Supported scope | Boundary to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| Target tasks | Readback confirms the intended references | Clarify ambiguous or missing work |
| Dependency contract | Receiving owner states the required deliverable | Avoid unexplained graph arrows |
| Creation interface | Supported body fields and preview evidence | Do not transfer fields into unsupported updates |
No. The inspected skill documents body-file fields, not flags with those names.
Resolve a stable task reference first; a similar title is not a verified dependency target.
No. The brief is a manual planning resource. Use the product access link to check onboarding and the workflows available in your account.
From a useful outline to team work
This manual brief helps an authorized TeamBoost CLI user keep identity, query scope and review evidence explicit. Check the installed interface and account access before using a source-backed command. Confirm the workflows available in your account before adopting this outline.
Opens the current invite-request page. Access is subject to approval; this example is not imported automatically.